Search

Searching with a thematic focus on Technology and innovation in agriculture, Agriculture and food

Showing 461-470 of 616 results

Pages

• Document

  African hunger and GM maize

  SciDev.Net, 2002

  This short editorial from SciDev.Net explores the issues around the decision by Zimbabwe and Zambia to reject US food aid because it contains some genetically modified grain.The author briefly discusses the perceived health risks, the economic implcations in terms of trade and the political issues which inform this debate and pinpoints a number of lessons which should be learned.
• Document

  Better dead than GM fed?

  GRAIN, 2002

  Article from GRAIN which provides commentary on the controvesy surrounding the use of GM food aid in the Southern Africa food crisis.
• Document

  WFP policy on donations of foods derived from biotechnology (GM/biotech foods)

  United Nations [UN] World Food Programme, 2002

  This paper, presented to the WFP Executive Board for consideration, outlines the WFP policy on donations of foods derived from biotechnology, summarises lessons learned from the Southern Africa emergency and outlines follow-up measures.The WFP policy that has been in effect with regard to all donations of foods is summarised as follows:WFP distributes only foods that meet the food safet
• Document

  Science, policy and regulation: challenges for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries

  Millennium Development Goals, 2001

  This paper addresses the question of the relationship between science, policy and regulation in the context of debates about the future of agricultural biotechnology. First the paper outlines some of the challenges for biotechnology policy and regulation before exploring the different contexts for biotechnology science and the framing of the policy debate.
• Document

  Biotechnology and the politics of regulation

  Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2001

  This paper aims to refine thinking about the politics of regulating crop biotechnologies. Firstly it explores the purposes regulation serves in commercial, as well as broader social and political terms, arguing that risk management, facilitating trade and generating public trust are three of its key functions.
• Document

  Biotechnology and the policy process: Zimbabwe

  Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002

  This paper focuses on three areas of the biotechnology policy process. Firstly, it looks at the national policy framework, identifying key development and economic policies and in particular considering the implications of policy on food security and development.
• Document

  Agricultural biotechnology and food security: Exploring the debate

  Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002

  This paper aims to explore the various dimensions of the debate over the extent to which agricultural biotechnology offers a solution to issues of food security. It begins by looking at the assumptions of the arguments made by various protagonists and situating historically the contemporary discussion of agricultural biotechnology in broader debates about food security.
• Document

  Modern biotechnology and developing-world agriculture

  Environment Team, IDS Sussex, 2002

  This essay provides and introduction to agricultural biotechnology in a developing country context. The author looks at issues of food security, consumer acceptance, sectoral change and regulation in the context of advances in genomics and bioinformatics which have led to an increase in the rate and volume of advances in the biotech.
• Document

  USAID and GM food aid

  Greenpeace International, 2002

  This paper is essentially a rebuttal of claims by the head of USAID that environmental groups were "endangering the lives of millions of people in southern Africa by encouraging local governments to reject genetically modified (GM) food aid".
• Document

  To die or not to die: this is the problem

  AgBioWorld Foundation, 2002

  This paper from the AgBioWorld Foundation is a direct response to an earlier paper from the Zambian Kasisi Agricultural Training Centre (KATC) and the Jesuit Centre for Theological Reflection (JCTR) which challenged the suitability of existing GM technology for Zambian agriculture and supported their Governments position with regard to GM food aid.The authors directly attack the findings of the

Pages