Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Agricultural biodiversity and natural resource management, Trade Policy
Showing 61-70 of 71 results
Pages
- Document
Who owns the ecosystem?
Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1999Paper is about how human society organizes its proprietary relationship to the biosphere and, in particular, the property implications of ecosystem management. Our premise is that ecosystem management is endangered by its "bigger-is-better" bias, the potential source of public backlash among landowners.DocumentIntellectual property rights: ultimate control of agricultural R&D in Asia
Genetic Engineering & Intellectual Property Rights Resource Center, 2001Discusses the pressure on Asian countries to adopt plant variety protection (PVP) systems based on Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants UPOV.DocumentAdjustment and poverty in Mexican agriculture: how farmers' wealth affects supply response
Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank, 1995By and large, it appears that the goals of agricultural reform are being met in Mexico.DocumentCompensating local communities for conserving biodiversity: how much, who will, how and when
Society for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions, 1999Large number of local communities across the world have shared unhesitatingly their knowledge about local biodiversity and its different uses with outsiders including researchers, corporations, gene collectors and of course, activists. Many continue to share despite knowing that by withholding this knowledge they could receive pecuniary advantage.DocumentBiotechnology in Crops: Issues for the developing world
Oxfam, 1998Overview of issues and actors in the debate on genetically modified crops.DocumentSelling Suicide: farming, false promises and genetic engineering in developing countries
Christian Aid, 1999Experience shows that large gaps between rich and poor, ownership of resources concentrated in too few hands, and a food supply based on too few varieties of crops, are the classic preconditions for hunger and famine. New technologies are taking us further down this ill-advised farm track.DocumentThe environmental and social impacts of economic liberalization on corn production in Mexico
Oxfam, 2001Examines Mexico’s effort to liberalise and “modernise” its agricultural sector, and in particular its domestic production of corn.Conclusions:liberalisation has failed to achieve the environmental and social improvements it promised.DocumentIntellectual property protection: who needs it?
Genetic Engineering & Intellectual Property Rights Resource Center, 2001Addresses some of the arguments against IPR and indicates how strengthening intellectual property rights will enable farmers throughout the world to receive the latest developments in crop production.Conclusions:enforceable and strong IPRs are essential to encourage the transfer of the latest technologies to developing countries, and for stimulating research in these same new tecDocumentGeneral equilibrium modelling of trade and the environment / John Beghin ...[et al.]
OECD Development Centre, 1996The environmental impacts of economic activity have become an increasingly urgent concern in both OECD Member countries, as well as in non-Member countries. Research in this area is still in its infancy, and the data required to buttress analytical studies is still sparse.DocumentMalawi: Services and policies needed to support sustainable smallholder agriculture
Environment and Development Consultancy Ltd, 1997Malawi’ s smallholder agriculture is facing a crisis, particularly in the more populated south. There is an insidious combination of land shortage, continuous cultivation of maize, declining soil fertility, low yields, deforestation, poverty and high population growth rate.Pages
