Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Governance
Showing 721-730 of 808 results
Pages
- Document
Decentralization and corruption: evidence across Countries
Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank, 2000The relationship between decentralization of government activities and the extent of rent extraction by private parties is an important element in the recent debate on institutional design.The theoretical literature makes ambiguous predictions about this relationship, and it has remained virtually unexamined by empiricists.DocumentRethinking the decentralisation and devolution of biodiversity conservation
Unasylva, FAO, 1999This article challenges devolution and populist approaches to biodiversity conservation and forest management by examining several of the main assumptions on which they are based.The concept of partnership in conservation is based on the following, often contested,assumptions: local populations are interested and skilled in sustainable forest resource use and conservation;contempoDocumentDevolution and decentralisation of forest management in Asia and the Pacific
Unasylva, FAO, 1999Decentralization and devolution are dominant themes in the contemporary discussion of forest policy.DocumentGodsend, sleight of hand or just muddling through: joint water and forest management in India
Natural Resource Perspectives, ODI, 2000This paper lays out the complex politics underpinning joint management and identifies the potential for, and route towards more, if gradual, decentralisation in the future.The paper draws the following conclusions: Conventional analyses of joint management are rooted in organisational theory; their apolitical character severely limits their explanatory powerJoint management arrangeDocumentThe effectiveness of decentralization in Hungary and Slovakia
International Monetary Fund, 2000This paper contrasts decentralization in Hungary, one of the most decentralized countries of Central and Eastern Europe, and in Slovakia, one of the least decentralized, during the decade of transition from socialism to market.DocumentEliminating world poverty: making globalisation work for the poor
DFID White Paper on Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor, 2000While progress has been made over the years in development, many challenges yet remain in order to make globalisation work for the poor.DocumentCommunity based rural development: reducing rural poverty from the ground up
Rural Development Strategy Team, World Bank, 2001This article investigates Community Based Rural Development, which is an approach to reducing rural poverty that promotes collective action by communities and puts them in control of development interventions by making community based organizations (CBOs) driving forces in the process.Conclusions:CBOs directly manage most project resources.DocumentGlobal farming systems study: challenges and priorities to 2030
Rural Development Strategy Team, World Bank, 2001For more than a decade, the proportion of internationally supported public investment directed at agriculture and the rural sector in developing countries has been declining. Moreover, this is occuring at a time in which the process of globalisation is changing patters of trade and investment, placing agricultural producers and communities under tremendous pressure to adapt in order to survive.DocumentDemocratic decentralisation
Center for International Development, Research Triangle Institute (RTI), 1997suggests that the strategic objective that democratic decentralization serves is to broaden legitimacy, transparency, and accountability within the political systems of the countries where the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is providing development assistance.Article explores Research Triangle Institute's (RTI) engagement in a task to clarify how and under what circuDocumentKingship, bureaucracy and participation: competing moralities of ‘decentralisation’ in south Indian irrigation
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 2000This paper attempts a long view of decentralisation in irrigation management in parts of south India. In doing so, it has attempted to place present day ‘Participatory Irrigation Management’ in perspective, particularly by drawing attention to antecedent forms of ‘decentralisation’ and suggesting that some of the practices and moralities involved persist today.Pages
