Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Governance, Norway
Showing 91-100 of 196 results
Pages
- Document
Multistakeholder Forestry Program - Milestones and Challenges, 2010
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation - NORAD, 2010The Forest Governance Program (FGP), under the Environmental and Economic Governance (EEG) Cluster of the Kemitraan Partnership in Indonisia aims to fund and support multi-stakeholder partnerships that improve forest governance, deliver more equitable benefits to primary forest stakeholders, and encourage more sustainable management of forest resources.DocumentSafeguarding REDD+ finance: ensuring transparent and accountable international financial flows
Global Witness, 2012Funding forest protection in developing countries poses numerous financial risks, from inefficient allocation through to mismanagement of funds, misappropriation and corruption; detailed measures will be needed to ensure effective, transparent and accountable financial flows if greenhouse gas emissions from forest loss are to be reduced.DocumentEvaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation to promote human rights: mapping study
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation - NORAD, 2011Almost 10 billion kroner (approximately 1,8 billion US dollars) havebeen given to development cooperation to promote human rights over thepast decade. This Mapping Study is the first deliverable for the evaluation of Norway’s support to the field of human rights over the last ten years.DocumentEvaluation of Norwegian Development Cooperation to Promote Human Rights: evaluation
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation - NORAD, 2011Is there a clear policy behind the Norwegian support to human rights? Is there a specific Norwegian profile in the support to human rights and what results have been achieved?DocumentPeace From the bottom-up? The Afghanistan Peace and Reintegration Program
International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, 2011Since late 2010 the Afghan government, supported by its international partners, has tried to reintegrate insurgents under the Afghan Peace and Reintegration Program (APRP). The APRP aims to entice fighters from the battlefield with security, jobs and other incentives – provided they renounce violence, respect the Afghan constitution and cut ties with al-Qaeda.DocumentKenya Country Case Study: Child Rights
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation - NORAD, 2011The Kenya country case study examines 12 project interventions as part of a broader evaluation of Norwegian and Swedish aid interventions in support of child rights. The report finds an improving legal and policy framework with regard to child rights in Kenya and highlights the role of Kenyan CSOs in achieving this.DocumentReview of and recommendations for Norwegian support to good governance in Pakistan
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation - NORAD, 2011A Governance review including political economy analysis of Pakistan with the main focus being on overall power relations at the national, provincial and local levels (particularly Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province (KPK)) . The overall analysis addresses key sectors of Norwegian development cooperation with Pakistan including:DocumentTackling corruption for governing REDD in the Philippines
Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, 2011National efforts to reverse forest degradation in the Philippines have taken on a new dimension in the context of recent international focus on mitigating the effects of climate change.DocumentAfghan hydrocarbons: addressing corruption to fuel development?
Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, 2010Use of Afghanistan’s oil and gas resources, if properly handled, could have considerable spin-off effects for development in the country. This paper suggests, however, that governing the country’s hydrocarbons will be far from straightforward, as a result of mistrust between local and central authorities, and the feeling that corruption risks are widespread.DocumentUsers' guide on measuring fragility
United Nations Development Programme, 2009In light of the growing recognition and understanding of the close linkages between governance and fragility, this Users’ Guide presents a comparative analysis of cross-country fragility indices. The paper assesses the indices’ conceptual premises, methodological approach and possible uses.Pages
