Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Technology and innovation in agriculture, Agriculture and food, Bioprospecting and IPRs, Environment, Biotechnology and GMOs, Trade Policy, Intellectual Property Rights
Showing 1-10 of 13 results
Pages
- Document
Farmers' rights in India: a case study
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2006India is among the first countries in the world to have passed Farmers’ Rights and plant variety protection legislation. This study analyses the achievements, barriers and limitations of India’s approach so far.DocumentIntellectual property and biological resources: an overview of key issues and current debates.
Wuppertal Institute, 2005This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background and overview of key issues, debates and positions related to the international regulation and application of intellectual property rights over biological resources. This includes biotechnology and the use and protection of the traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities.DocumentTerminator technology: the economic benefits of sterile seeds
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Terminator technology – the emerging technology for inducing sterility in seeds – is potentially detrimental to both biodiversity and the livelihoods of poor farmers forced to buy fresh seed every year. Repeat seed purchase, however, provides greater scope for companies to capture returns on their research investments in plant breeding.DocumentFood security and intellectual property rights in developing countries
International Environmental Law Research Centre, 2003This paper examines the implications of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on food security and the agricultural sector.DocumentBiotechnology and the issues interconnected with and through it
Biowatch South Africa, 2002This paper takes a step back from the policy issues surrounding biotechnology and its role in development to present a broad discussion of the biotechnology sector and its implications.The paper argues that if biotechnology is to develop usefully, the risks involved with it should be prevented.DocumentIntellectual property rights in African agriculture: implications for small farmers
GRAIN, 2002This paper looks at the choice facing African policy-makers over which of two opposing models of agricultural R&D to choose to support. One is driven by multinational companies in the North and relies upon private monopolies and genetically modified crops.DocumentIntellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity: The Economic Myths
GRAIN, 1999Examines the economic costs and benefits of the WTO's Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs), with special regard for developing countries and their wealth of biological diversity.DocumentReview of the TRIPS agreement
Biotechnology and Development Monitor, 1998Themed issue of the Monitor, with chapters submitted by various authors.DocumentCompensating local communities for conserving biodiversity: how much, who will, how and when
Society for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions, 1999Large number of local communities across the world have shared unhesitatingly their knowledge about local biodiversity and its different uses with outsiders including researchers, corporations, gene collectors and of course, activists. Many continue to share despite knowing that by withholding this knowledge they could receive pecuniary advantage.DocumentTen reasons not to join UPOV [Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants]
GRAIN, 1998Developing countries are currently facing intense pressure to institute intellectual property rights (IPRs) for plant varieties. Despite the fact that the brief history of IPRs over plants and biological resources has undermined local biodiversity in the North and precipitated corporate monopolies over the food system, Southern countries are being forced to travel the same path.Pages
