Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Agriculture and food, Biotechnology and GMOs, Trade Policy
Showing 1-10 of 71 results
Pages
- Document
Genetically modified food and international trade : The case of India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2007This paper studies the potential effects of introducing genetically modified (GM) food crops in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines in the presence of trade-related regulations of GM food in major importers. It focuses on GM field crops (rice, wheat, maize, soybeans, and cotton) resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses, such as drought-resistant rice.DocumentDo consumers really care about biotech food label? What do we know? What else should we know?
AgEcon Search, 2009This paper examines whether biotech food labelling has an impact on consumers’ vegetable oil purchasing decisions. The paper first states that some countries, such as the EU, have implemented mandatory labelling policy. However, other countries, such as the US, have adopted voluntary labelling policy that leaves the decision whether to label biotech food to each enterprise.DocumentPublish or patent? Knowledge dissemination in agricultural biotechnology
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2008The development of new technologies, together with changes in institutional environments toward privatisation of research outputs, has given scientists different incentives to disseminate their research outputs. This paper discusses the recent trends in plant transformation research by examining patent and journal publication data during the last decade.DocumentGetting out of the food crisis
GRAIN, 2008The current food crisis is focusing attention on the way food reaches some of the most disadvantaged people in the world. In this edition of GRAIN's Seedling magazine, a collection of articles highlight the less discussed aspects of the food crisis and responses to it.DocumentLooking a gift horse in the mouth: the case of Zambia’s refusal to accept american food aid
Noragric, Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2007A failure to recongnise the complexity of food issues has led to the development of diverse and conflicting regulatory systems to address food trade and food safety. This paper uses the example of Zambia's refusal of American GM maize as food aid in 2002 to illustrate this point. It discusses:DocumentLegal aspects of exchange, use and conservation of farm animal genetic resources
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2007This report is a background study for the FAO commissioned study ‘Exchange, Use andDocumentFarmers' rights in India: a case study
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2006India is among the first countries in the world to have passed Farmers’ Rights and plant variety protection legislation. This study analyses the achievements, barriers and limitations of India’s approach so far.DocumentChina as a standard-setter: the examples of GM-cotton and ecological and food safety standards
Asian Drivers Programme, Institute of Development Studies, 2006This paper examines the debates surrounding Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and the cotton industry, and its impact on the textile market. The role of China as a pace-setter in this context is also analysed.DocumentAfrican policy dialogues on biotechnology: background paper
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003This background paper examines the positive and negative aspects of intellectual property rights (IPR) in agricultural biotechnologies with respect to the varying positions of different stakeholders.DocumentIntellectual property and biological resources: an overview of key issues and current debates.
Wuppertal Institute, 2005This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background and overview of key issues, debates and positions related to the international regulation and application of intellectual property rights over biological resources. This includes biotechnology and the use and protection of the traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities.Pages
