Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Biotechnology and GMOs, Agriculture and food, Biotechnology and GMOs governance, Intellectual Property Rights, Trade Policy, Technology and innovation in agriculture
Showing 1-10 of 17 results
Pages
- Document
Farmers' rights in India: a case study
Fridtjof Nansen Institute, 2006India is among the first countries in the world to have passed Farmers’ Rights and plant variety protection legislation. This study analyses the achievements, barriers and limitations of India’s approach so far.DocumentChina as a standard-setter: the examples of GM-cotton and ecological and food safety standards
Asian Drivers Programme, Institute of Development Studies, 2006This paper examines the debates surrounding Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and the cotton industry, and its impact on the textile market. The role of China as a pace-setter in this context is also analysed.DocumentAfrican policy dialogues on biotechnology: background paper
International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003This background paper examines the positive and negative aspects of intellectual property rights (IPR) in agricultural biotechnologies with respect to the varying positions of different stakeholders.DocumentIntellectual property and biological resources: an overview of key issues and current debates.
Wuppertal Institute, 2005This paper aims to provide a comprehensive background and overview of key issues, debates and positions related to the international regulation and application of intellectual property rights over biological resources. This includes biotechnology and the use and protection of the traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities.DocumentBiotechnology politics in Delhi’s corridors of power
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Liberalisation in India relaxed several restrictions on the activities of foreign firms that operate locally. Consequently, an increasing number of multinational agricultural biotechnology companies set up operations in India. New Delhi’s biotechnology policy is now influenced by a small number of major foreign firms and local entrepreneurs with national and global connections.DocumentTerminator technology: the economic benefits of sterile seeds
id21 Development Research Reporting Service, 2003Terminator technology – the emerging technology for inducing sterility in seeds – is potentially detrimental to both biodiversity and the livelihoods of poor farmers forced to buy fresh seed every year. Repeat seed purchase, however, provides greater scope for companies to capture returns on their research investments in plant breeding.DocumentGoverning the GM crop revolution: policy choices for developing countries
2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture and the Environment, International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000This paper introduces a system for classifying policy choices toward GM crops in the areas of intellectual property rights, food safety, biosafety, trade, and public research investment.DocumentTrips with everything? Intellectual property and the farming world
Food Ethics Council, 2002This report briefly outlines some general issues arising in intellectual property (IP), in addition to discussing the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) in the World Trade Organization.DocumentIntellectual property rights and concentration in agricultural biotechnology
Cornell University Library, 2003This paper explores the relationship between intellectual property rights (IPRs) and structural change in the agricultural biotechnology industry.DocumentGlobalisation and the international governance of modern biotechnology: development of IPR regime in India with reference to agricultural biotechnology
Institute of Development Studies UK, 2003This paper looks at debates over the evolution of the IPRs regime in India as it relates to agricultural biotechnology.Pages
