Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Theories of good government, Governance
Showing 1-10 of 75 results
Pages
- Document
Gatekeepers, elders and accountability in Somalia
Overseas Development Institute, 2017In Somalia, the relationship between formal and informal spheres of governance are being renegotiated. In many areas, the formal state has been absent for a long time, or government agents only recently appointed by the Federal Government of Somalia.DocumentSanctions, benefits, and rights: three faces of accountability
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2010As countries throughout the world democratise and decentralise, citizen participation in public life should increase. It is said citizens in a decentralised and democratic system of government are governed better because they can punish electorally those who do not deliver on promises.DocumentTaxation, governance and state-building: concepts and issues
Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, 2008This PowerPoint presentation outlines why taxation matters for development, perspectives on taxation and state-building and the taxation/aid/governance discourse. It shows that taxation matters for developing state capacity for service delivery and in democratic state building. However, it is rarely central in economic and policy debates in aid dependent countries for the following reasons:DocumentParadoxes of public accountability in Malaysia: control mechanisms and their limitations
International Public Management Review, 2006Public accountability has become difficult to ensure. There are a variety of factors, often rooted in the politico-bureaucratic institutions that render accountability mechanisms largely ineffective. This article considers public accountability in Malaysia and its limitations.DocumentDo power sharing institutions work? Stable democracy and good governance in divided societies
John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2005Proponents of Consociation Theory argue that institutional power-sharing arrangements serve to reduce societal conflicts and provide political stability and conditions conducive for good governance in divided societies.DocumentDemocracy’s quality and breakdown: new lessons from Thailand
Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University, Hong Kong, 2007This paper assesses democracy’s quality with reference to Thailand under the recent Thai Rak Thai government. It enumerates some of the conceptual difficulties that arise in these types of assessment exercises and discusses lessons that can be drawn from Thailand. The analysis is based on a framework that involves electoral mandates, policy responsiveness, and accountabilityDocumentShould market liberalisation precede democracy?: causal relations between political preferences and development
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2007This paper debates whether democratisation must happen after market liberalisation has taken place. Focusing on the relationship between market development and democracy, the authors ask whether it is true that demand for democracy only emerges after a certain degree of market development is reached, and whether it is likely to be an obstacle to the acceptance of market liberalisation.DocumentPersonal power networks and economic development in Satun (Thailand) and Perlis (Malaysia)
Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University, Hong Kong, 2007This paper debates whether personal power can be included in the networks analysis of entrepreneurship and economic development in Southeast Asia. A comparison is made of Satun in Southern Thailand and Perlis in Northern Malaysia using the embedded mercantilism approach.DocumentModeling ineffecient institutions
National Bureau of Economic Research, USA, 2006Many economists and social scientists have recently emphasised the importance of government institutions for economic growth. This paper develops a model to show why inefficient institutions are built and allowed to persist.DocumentGood enough governance revisited
Blackwell Synergy, 2007Good governance has been recognised as an important policy agenda for development organisations but how do these organisations prioritise governance reforms in the context of limited resources. This article suggests that the feasibility of particular interventions can be assessed by analysing the context for change and the implications of the content of the intervention being considered.Pages
