Search
Searching with a thematic focus on Trade Policy, Agriculture trade policy, agriculture CAP
Showing 1-10 of 32 results
Pages
- Document
Reforming the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: health check, budget review, Doha Round
European centre for international political economy, 2008While the European Commission has tabled a proposal for reforming the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), the World Trade Organisation (WTO) might necessitate further decisions on agricultural tariff cuts at any time. Related to that, this policy brief argues in favour of a fundamental reform of agricultural policy in the European Union (EU).DocumentGlobal and EU agricultural trade reform: what is in it for Tanzania, Uganda and Sub-Saharan Africa?
Trinity College, Dublin, 2005This discussion paper focuses on the effects of total agricultural trade liberalisation (TAL) in Uganda and Tanzania using the Agricultural Trade Policy Simulation Model (ATPSM) which estimates the effects of total agricultural liberalisation (TAL) on:prices and terms of trade on changes in supplydemand and trade flowson welfare effects for producers and consumers.EstimDocumentU.S. and EU farm policy—how similar?
Economic Research Service, USDA, 2004This document examines and compares U.S. and E.U. commodity policies. It provides a description of the basic mechanisms of U.S.DocumentThe EU’s CAP, the Doha Round and developing countries
University of California, Berkeley Library, 2004This study analyses the political economy of European Union (EU) policy-making in regard to EU trade in beef and dairy with developing countries.DocumentTruth or consequences: why the EU and the USA must reform their subsidies, or pay the price
Oxfam, 2005Folowing the findings by the WTO that US cotton subsidies and EU sugar subsidies are illegal, this paper presents new research detailing a number of other rich country subsidies that, as the paper argues, are also on the wrong side of the law.DocumentSailing close to the wind: navigating the WTO Hong Kong Ministerial
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 2005This briefing book looks in depth at some of the key issues being negotiated at the Hong Kong ministerial (2005). It includes fact sheets that provide a quick overview, and in-depth reports on some of the major controversies.DocumentSweet or sour: the US sugar programme and the threats posed by the Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 2005This paper argues that the Central America Free Trade Agreement could have far-reaching impacts on poorer countries. It highlights the U.S. sugar programme, noting that it is the only major U.S. agricultural commodity programme that operates at no cost to taxpayers and prevents U.S.DocumentDumping on the poor: the Common Agricultural Policy, the WTO and International Development
Catholic Fund for Overseas Development, 2005This paper critiques the EU's Common Agricultural Policy as a mechanism that promotes over-production and dumping of cheap goods that undercut local markets in developing countries. At the same time tariffs and other obstacles prevent agricultural producers in these countries from accessing the European markets for their own goods.DocumentThe antidumping negotiations: proposals, positions and antidumping profiles
Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 2005This paper examines the positions taken by major actors in the negotiations over the rules governing the use of antidumping (AD) duties that are occurring in both the World Trade Organization and the Free Trade Area of the Americas.DocumentBuilding on the July Framework Agreement: options for agriculture
International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council, USA, 2005This issue brief is intended to provide negotiators and other interested stakeholders with an independent analysis of options for elaborating the “July Framework Agreement” as negotiations between WTO members move towards the development of concrete negotiating modalities at the Hong Kong Ministerial in December 2005.Pages
